A woman receiving just $1,460 per month in Social Security benefits is locked in a legal and financial standoff with her millionaire ex-husband, aged 74, who has stopped making court-ordered alimony payments — a situation that highlights a growing vulnerability among older divorced women who rely on spousal support to bridge retirement income gaps. The case, first reported in a MarketWatch column, is drawing renewed attention to the intersection of family law, retirement security, and the enforcement mechanisms available to low-income claimants.
The woman’s monthly income of $1,460 places her uncomfortably close to the federal poverty threshold for a single-person household, which in 2024 stands at approximately $1,255 per month, or $15,060 annually. With alimony payments suspended, her annual income of roughly $17,520 offers only a narrow buffer, leaving little room for healthcare costs, housing, or emergencies — expenses that tend to escalate sharply in later life.

Legal Remedies Are Available but Often Costly to Pursue
Family law attorneys note that alimony, also called spousal support or maintenance depending on the state, is a legally enforceable obligation. When a paying spouse refuses to comply, the recipient has several enforcement tools available through the court system. These include filing a motion for contempt of court, which can result in wage garnishment, asset liens, seizure of bank accounts, and in extreme cases, incarceration for the non-compliant party.
The challenge, however, is that enforcement requires legal representation, which carries its own cost burden. Attorney fees for family court proceedings can range from $200 to $500 per hour in many jurisdictions, meaning a woman already stretched thin financially may face a paradox: spending money she does not have in order to recover money she is owed. Some states offer legal aid services for low-income individuals, and family law clinics at law schools can provide guidance at reduced or no cost. Advocates recommend that recipients document all missed payments meticulously and file with the court promptly, as delays can complicate enforcement.
There is also the matter of ex-spousal Social Security benefits, which are separate from alimony entirely. Under current Social Security Administration rules, a divorced spouse may be entitled to claim benefits based on an ex-partner’s earnings record — up to 50 percent of the ex-spouse’s primary insurance amount — provided the marriage lasted at least ten years and the claimant remains unmarried. If the woman in question qualifies, this benefit could meaningfully supplement her existing $1,460 monthly payment, potentially increasing her total Social Security income without affecting what her ex-husband receives.

Retirement Security for Divorced Women Remains a Structural Problem
This individual case is far from isolated. Research consistently shows that divorced women over 60 face disproportionate financial precarity in retirement. Women on average earn less over their working lives, take more time out of the workforce for caregiving, and accumulate smaller Social Security benefits as a result. The median annual Social Security income for women aged 65 and older hovers around $16,000, compared with roughly $21,000 for men — a gap of approximately 24 percent that persists into late retirement years.
Alimony, where awarded, is intended to address this structural imbalance — particularly in long marriages where one spouse sacrificed career advancement to support a household. When that support is withheld by a high-net-worth individual, the power asymmetry becomes acute. Wealthy respondents can afford prolonged litigation, while claimants on fixed incomes cannot. Legal experts advise such individuals to seek enforcement action as early as possible to avoid allowing arrears to compound into sums that become practically unrecoverable even with a favorable judgment.
The broader financial stakes for older Americans navigating retirement on constrained incomes are significant, as our earlier coverage of a retiree’s portfolio decline and escalating healthcare costs demonstrates. Housing affordability also plays a compounding role, with U.S. home prices reaching record highs this summer, further squeezing those on fixed incomes who rent or seek to downsize. For the woman at the center of this dispute, the most immediate priority remains securing legal counsel and initiating contempt proceedings before additional payments are missed.